Moonwars

Background: (from NASA-http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/28jul_crashlanding.htm)

In 1959, a spaceship fell out of the lunar sky and hit the ground near the Sea of Serenity. The ship itself was shattered, but its mission was a success. Luna 2 from the Soviet Union had became the first manmade object to "land" on the Moon.

Even after NASA mastered soft landings, however, the crashing continued. In the late 1960s and early 70s, mission controllers routinely guided massive Saturn rocket boosters into the Moon to make the ground shake for Apollo seismometers. Crashing was much easier than orbiting, they discovered. The Moon's uneven gravity field tugs on satellites in strange ways, and without frequent course corrections, orbiters tend to veer into the ground. Thus the Moon became a convenient graveyard for old spaceships: All five of NASA's Lunar Orbiters (1966-1972), four Soviet Luna probes (1959-1965), two Apollo sub-satellites (1970-1971), Japan's Hiten spacecraft (1993) and NASA's Lunar Prospector (1999) ended up in craters of their own making.

____________________________________________________________________

China’s first satellite, Chang’e I crash landed into the moon Sunday March the 1st at 4:13 PM Beijing time. This successfully completed a 16 month long mission; yes you heard right the crash landing was planned. Change’e I, named after the Chinese moon goddess, was launched from the Xichang Satellite Launch Center also known as Base 27 which is a little over 50km outside the city of Xichange in China. The satellite was launched with a Long March 3-A carrier rocket on October 24, 2007 and spent 494 days in space collecting data. This mission was essentially a test run for future rover landing missions to take place in 2009 and 2012. China is also planning a manned lunar exploration mission on or before 2020.

... the lunar explorer "KAGUYA" just prior to its maneuvered falling to the Moon ... The KAGUYA was launched on September 14, 2007, and was controlled to be dropped to the Moon on June 11, 2009, as its mission was completed.

... The collision reportedly took place at 1655 GMT on Tuesday the 10 February, at an altitude of 490 miles above Siberia.Two satellites smashed into each other on Tuesday, creating a mess of space debris that is still being counted. The collision, which involved an Iridium communication satellite and a defunct Russian satellite, is the first to occur between two intact spacecraft - but experts say it is unlikely to be the last.

_______________________________________________________________________

Now i had also heard about a nasa craft already having hit the deck this year too, but can't find anything among all the newer stories.

I hadn't realised how many craft had hit the moon, and i'm astounded at the nonchalance displayed(!). I would consider the moon on a par with antarctica, valuable because of it's pristeneness, and possible value to posterity. There is none of the future, only now.

The satellite crash was a first though, and apparently the DATA showed they were supposed to miss by 500metres or so. Oh really? THAT is h0w badly they know what they are doing up there, half a kilometre VARIANCE???

WHat i wanted to highlight though, was that tis year, 3 different space agencies have crash landed the moon. That's BIZARRE!!! Why on earth (yar ok punny) would they DO something like that?

Enter Wikipedia: (why do they call it psuedoscience? it's a theory, with reasonable scientific calculations and observations to support the theory. Since the official version is AS theoretical, it seeems a little arrogant)
Two pieces of evidence are quoted in support of the pseudoscientific theory of a hollow Moon:
Seismometer recordings from Apollo XII mission in November 1969. After seismometers were set up on the Moon's surface by the astronauts of Apollo XII, astronauts heading back to Earth discarded the ascent stage of the lunar module, dropping it on the Moon's surface. The craft smashed and the shock waves the seismometers picked up lasted for about an hour.
The relatively low average density of the Moon, which is only about 60% of the average density of the Earth.

Hmmmm, so our moon is lighter than we thought, a LOT lighter by apparearances. Also, how would a piece of debris, a few tons maybe, get the moon to resonate for half an hour? Not only that, but now they're going to do that again, with a 2 tons worth of bomb? To do what? Look for water? um, water is a lot easier to find inbulk than in aerosol form? Isnt it? (i have no idea, but after a bomb goes off, stuff scatters, and solid items break into smaller pieces, usually moving very fast) ...

Of course, there is more, like why is it always facing the same way? Why is it the apparent same size as our sun? There are no "scientific" reasons for these 2 questions. And why for flying fuck sakes, can i not find a picture of the dark side of the fucking moon? WE KNOW THEY HAVE TAKEN MILLIONS OF PICTURES!!

Yet, somehow, the only pictures that ever surface are on "conspiracy" websites, which are "obviously" all faked. But those are the only images we have, the official NASA and JAPAN photos, well, they just haven't released them, as they both said they would, before they had taken.

Now i'm not saying ANYTHING. I ask. My conclusions of course, are fed by others who ask too. But somehow there is something that NASA, et al are not telling us.

Oh PS, another question: UNEVEN GRAVITY FIELD?

You do not prevaricate unless you are hiding ... something.